Daughter forced dying mother’s hand to sign a will that cut out her brother and left her as the sole beneficiary of their mother’s £700,000 estate. The shocking case, which took place in the United Kingdom, was brought before the Central London County Court after video evidence revealed the extent of coercion involved in the signing of the will.
The court ruled in favor of the woman’s son, John Baverstock, and declared the will invalid, ensuring that the estate would be divided equally between him and his sister, Lisa Baverstock.
The Dispute Over the Will
The legal battle between the siblings arose after the death of their mother, Margaret Baverstock, in March 2021. Margaret, a former care worker, had been diagnosed with dementia in 2014 and was in a severely weakened state at the time she allegedly signed the will.
The new will, created just days before her death, disinherited John and left the entirety of her assets, including her house in Herne Hill, South London, to Lisa Baverstock.
John, a 61-year-old electrician, challenged the will in court, arguing that his mother was too mentally frail to understand the document she was signing.
The evidence presented in court included video footage that showed Margaret struggling to sign the document while Lisa appeared to be guiding her hand. The court was asked to determine whether the will represented the true wishes of the deceased or if it had been unlawfully influenced by Lisa.
Read : Three Michigan Brothers Declared Dead on Mother’s Request Who Disappeared at Thanksgiving in 2010
Lisa Baverstock, 55, insisted that the will accurately reflected their mother’s wishes and that Margaret had been “compos mentis” at the time of signing. She claimed that she had been the sole caregiver for their mother since 2019, giving up everything to look after her.
Daughter forces dying mother with dementia to sign over her fortune. pic.twitter.com/YolrIbfNjF
— Daily Mail Online (@MailOnline) March 7, 2025
According to Lisa, their mother had made it clear over the years that she did not want John to inherit anything. However, the court found that the circumstances surrounding the signing of the will raised serious concerns about its validity.
Court’s Findings and Judgment
During the proceedings, the court examined the video evidence, which played a crucial role in proving that the will was not an independent act of the deceased.
The footage, which was submitted by Lisa Baverstock herself, showed Margaret barely able to respond to questions and struggling to move her hand. The court found that Lisa had effectively “propelled” her mother’s hand to sign the document, casting doubt on its legitimacy.
Furthermore, the judge noted that the will had been drafted using an online template and was created solely by Lisa Baverstock. No legal professionals had been involved in the process, which added to the concerns over undue influence.
Given Margaret’s advanced dementia and frail condition, the court ruled that she did not have the necessary mental capacity to make such a significant decision at the time.
As a result, the judge declared the will invalid and ruled that Margaret had died intestate, meaning that her estate would be distributed according to intestacy laws. Under these rules, the estate was to be divided equally between John and Lisa Baverstock. This outcome restored John’s rightful share of his mother’s assets, amounting to £350,000.
In addition to losing her exclusive claim to the estate, Lisa Baverstock was ordered to pay John’s legal costs, which were estimated to be as much as £80,000. This financial burden added further consequences to her actions, highlighting the serious legal repercussions of attempting to manipulate the inheritance process.
The Impact and Lessons from the Case
The case of Margaret Baverstock’s will serves as a stark reminder of the importance of proper legal oversight in estate planning. The court’s ruling reinforced the principle that a will must be a true reflection of the testator’s wishes and not the result of coercion or undue influence.
This case also highlights the vulnerabilities of elderly individuals, particularly those suffering from dementia, and the need for safeguards to prevent exploitation.
For John, the ruling brought a sense of justice and recognition of his rightful place as a beneficiary of his mother’s estate. He had initially been excluded due to the manipulated will, but the legal process ultimately ensured a fair outcome.
His persistence in challenging the will demonstrated the importance of seeking justice when faced with suspicious circumstances regarding inheritance.
Lisa’s actions not only led to a costly legal battle but also caused a deep rift within the family. While she may have believed that she was carrying out her mother’s wishes, the manner in which the will was executed ultimately undermined her case.
The court’s findings underscored the importance of transparency, proper documentation, and the involvement of legal professionals in drafting a will, especially when dealing with vulnerable individuals.
This case also serves as a cautionary tale for families dealing with inheritance disputes. It emphasizes the necessity of clear communication, legal guidance, and ethical considerations when making decisions about an estate.
By ensuring that a will is properly drafted, witnessed, and executed with full mental capacity, families can prevent similar disputes and the emotional toll that accompanies them.
The ruling in John’s favor has set a precedent that will likely influence future cases involving contested wills, particularly those involving elderly individuals with cognitive impairments. It demonstrates the legal system’s commitment to protecting the rights of individuals who may be susceptible to undue influence and ensuring that inheritance laws are upheld fairly.
The Baverstock case is a powerful example of how inheritance disputes can become highly contentious and the lengths to which some individuals may go to secure an estate.
However, the court’s decision reaffirmed the principles of fairness and justice, ensuring that Margaret’s estate was distributed in accordance with the law rather than the manipulations of one party.
let’s enjoy few years on earth with peace and happiness….✍🏼🙏