In an unusual legal development from the United Arab Emirates, a man has won a substantial payout of approximately $30,000 after filing a lawsuit against his would-be employer for not allowing him to commence work. Despite never working a single day at the company, the court ruled in favor of the claimant, citing breach of contractual obligations and unjust withholding of wages.
The case, which has since garnered media attention across the Abu Dhabi and beyond, sets a significant precedent for employment law in the region and raises questions about corporate accountability, labor rights, and legal safeguards for workers who are hired but not permitted to begin their duties.
A Job Offer That Turned into a Legal Battle
The saga began when the employee, whose identity remains undisclosed, signed a fixed-term employment contract with a company in Abu Dhabi. According to the agreement, the man was to receive a basic salary of AED 7,200 and a total monthly compensation package of AED 24,000. With all formalities completed and an official offer letter issued, the expectation was that the employee would begin work promptly. However, that never happened.
The man waited for a call to start his duties, but it never came. Days turned into weeks, and weeks turned into months. Despite holding a legally binding contract and waiting to be placed, the company failed to initiate his employment.
The result was not only financial hardship for the employee but also considerable uncertainty about his future. Eventually, he decided to take the matter to court, alleging that his salary for the period from November 11, 2024, to April 7, 2025, had been unlawfully withheld.
This move proved to be pivotal. What started as an employment promise ended up becoming a courtroom drama that would underscore the importance of fair employment practices in the UAE.
Court’s Firm Stand on Contractual Obligations
The Abu Dhabi Labour Court took a firm stance on the matter. The case brought to light how vital it is for employers to honor contractual obligations once an offer letter is signed and accepted. The court reviewed various forms of evidence, including the signed contract, wage report, and documentation submitted through the case management system.
These documents clearly showed that the delay in commencing work was due to the employer’s inaction, not the employee’s misconduct or failure to report. The employer tried to argue that the man had taken leave before even starting the job, and thus was not entitled to any payment.
Read : Chak Hao Rice: The Black Jewel of Manipur Giving Proud to Whole India
However, this argument was swiftly dismantled. The court found no documentation or evidence suggesting that the employee had failed to report for duty or had been subject to any formal internal investigation regarding absenteeism. On the contrary, it was found that the employee was eager to start work and had been waiting for directions that never came.
The court’s judgment, therefore, was based not only on the provisions of the employment contract but also on a deeper principle: that a worker’s right to wages cannot be denied in the absence of solid proof. The verdict also referenced Article 912 of the Civil Transactions Law, reinforcing that wages are a protected right unless waived in writing or legally renounced by the worker.
Interestingly, the court also acknowledged that the employee had taken eight days of leave during the disputed period, which were deducted from the total claim. Despite this minor adjustment, the court ruled that the company was liable to pay the man wages equivalent to four months and 18 days of employment, amounting to AED 110,400.
This landmark case underscores how UAE law, particularly Federal Decree-Law No. (33) of 2021 on labor relations, emphasizes timely payment of wages and respect for employment agreements. Employers are reminded that their responsibilities begin not on the first working day, but from the moment a legal agreement is signed and a contractual relationship is formed.
A Wake-Up Call for Employers and Job Seekers Alike
This bizarre but telling case serves as a wake-up call for both employers and job seekers across the UAE and other regions with similar labor dynamics. For employers, it is a stark reminder that issuing an employment offer is not a formality to be taken lightly. It initiates a legal obligation that carries consequences if not fulfilled. Hiring without the intention or readiness to employ can result in lawsuits, financial loss, and reputational damage.
For job seekers, this case is an empowering example of how legal recourse can protect workers’ rights even in complex situations. Many employees might assume that if they haven’t started working, they have no legal standing to claim salaries. This ruling dismantles that myth. As demonstrated in this case, signing an employment contract initiates a relationship protected under labor laws, even if the first day of work never materializes.
The UAE’s proactive labor laws continue to evolve in ways that increasingly safeguard employee rights. This case reaffirms the significance of legal literacy among workers—knowing one’s rights, the value of a signed contract, and the importance of timely action when those rights are violated.
Furthermore, it raises questions about corporate responsibility in managing human resources. Why issue offer letters without a concrete plan for onboarding? Is there a loophole that companies exploit when they delay or prevent an employee from starting work? With this ruling, such practices are put under the microscope.
The case also sheds light on the transparency of the UAE’s legal system, particularly the labor courts. The ruling was not only based on contractual legality but also on the ethical considerations surrounding employment promises. It brings reassurance to foreign workers in the UAE, many of whom often worry about their legal standing when disputes arise with their employers.
As global work dynamics shift and labor migration remains common in the Gulf region, this case adds an important chapter to the narrative of labor rights and legal accountability.
In the digital age, where offer letters and contracts can be signed remotely and onboarding processes often get delayed due to administrative or operational lapses, the court’s decision sets a critical benchmark. Companies may now need to reassess their hiring procedures and ensure that once a commitment is made, it is followed through diligently, both ethically and legally.
While the idea of someone receiving nearly $30,000 without working a single day may sound bizarre or even controversial, this case is a textbook example of how justice can be delivered when contractual obligations are not met. It serves as both a cautionary tale and a beacon of hope for employees navigating complex job markets and unreliable employers. The courtroom victory of this Abu Dhabi man may inspire others to seek justice in situations that seem helpless or unprecedented.
It’s a rare story where doing nothing—literally—led to one man receiving his due, not by chance, but by virtue of the law.