The decision to rent out the gymnasium of Canyon Crest Academy to a production crew filming a 24-hour adult-themed livestream has ignited intense backlash across the San Dieguito Union High School District. What began as a routine facility rental arranged by the school’s fundraising arm instead evolved into a situation that students, parents, and educators have described as a grave lapse in judgment.
The event, filmed over the weekend and hosted by Twitch streamer Paymoneywubby, featured adult content models affiliated with Fansly, a subscription platform known for explicit material. Although no sexual acts were filmed on campus, the nature of the production — and the presence of adult models in a school gym — has prompted escalating questions about oversight, policy enforcement, and the responsibility of educational institutions to safeguard their spaces. The controversy has not only sparked student outrage but also triggered internal reviews that may shape future district policies surrounding facility use.
Student Backlash and Questions Over Oversight
Students at Canyon Crest Academy were among the first to react as confusion spread through campus late last week. With the gym closed off and whispers circulating about an unusual filming project underway, curiosity quickly turned into discomfort when clips from the livestream began to circulate online. A red folding chair marked with the school’s logo and other identifiable features from the weight room revealed that an event of questionable appropriateness had taken place inside the facility.
The livestream, running from December 6 to 7, was designed as an adaptation of a Japanese game show. Contestants spent 24 hours avoiding masked “Oni” characters who tagged participants and triggered various punishments. These included being struck with foam pool noodles, having their legs waxed, and licking chocolate off the feet of adult models who were present as part of the Fansly sponsorship.
Other segments involved sexually suggestive prompts, such as asking contestants to describe ideal genitalia or comment on age-related attraction, all in the presence of models wearing Fansly-branded bikinis. The resulting footage stood in stark contrast to the expectations of a public-school facility. Students have since demanded explanations, expressing frustration that a space meant for athletics, assemblies, and community events was repurposed for a production associated with explicit content.
Top Left: “Pedophile” sucking OF model’s toe
— Brad Conley⚖️🇺🇸 (@JB_Conley) December 8, 2025
Bottom Left: “Pedophile” wearing his sash with #pride
Right: “A California PUBLIC high school, Canyon Crest Academy, allegedly took $10,000 to let OF models film in a high school gym. I am exposing everything.” @amyforsandiego pic.twitter.com/1xsUJdHtt9
Many have voiced concerns about the message the rental sends to the student body and the precedent it could set if not addressed thoroughly by school administrators. Their unease reflects a broader sentiment shared by families who rely on schools to uphold standards of professionalism and appropriateness.
Foundation Decision-Making Under Scrutiny
The Canyon Crest Academy Foundation, responsible for fundraising and managing certain facility rentals, is now facing pointed criticism for approving the production’s use of the gym. According to district communications reported by local media, the foundation reviewed and signed off on the rental agreement without fully recognizing the implications of the event’s sponsorships and participants.
While Paymoneywubby’s lawyer asserted that the stream did not contain explicit adult content in the traditional sense, the presence of adult models, the sexually suggestive tasks, and the branding of Fansly contributed to what district officials now acknowledge was an inappropriate use of school property. NBC obtained an email from Principal Brett Killeen stating that the event violated standards outlined in the district’s own Use of Facilities License Agreement.
That agreement is intended to ensure that external rentals remain aligned with the school’s mission and do not expose students or the institution to reputational risk. Killeen’s statement reflects a growing acknowledgment that the oversight mechanisms failed in this instance and that the foundation’s internal processes may require revision. One of the major points of confusion stems from whether the district or the foundation fully understood Fansly’s role.
Reports suggest that the school had been made aware of the platform’s involvement but had not been informed that models themselves would appear on campus. The ambiguity surrounding the details of sponsorship and personnel involvement raises broader questions about the level of vetting conducted before campus spaces are opened to outside organizations. As facilities across the district are often rented to community groups, athletic clubs, and occasional production crews, this incident may lead to much stricter guidelines and expanded review requirements moving forward.
District Response and Potential Policy Implications
The San Dieguito Union High School District has not yet released a comprehensive public statement addressing the controversy, but the silence has only intensified the public’s desire for accountability. The district’s initial response indicates that administrators are aware of the severity of the situation and are now evaluating how such an event was permitted to occur under existing rules. As parents, students, and staff continue pressing for answers, attention is turning to what changes may be necessary to prevent similar incidents.
Given the prominence of the campus and its foundation, any policy shift is likely to affect multiple schools within the district. This could involve revising facility rental policies to require stricter disclosures from outside groups, mandating district-level approval for events with commercial sponsors, or limiting the use of school facilities for productions involving adult-oriented companies. The incident also underscores the importance of proactive communication between the district, school-level administrators, and independent fundraising foundations to ensure all parties share a clear understanding of rental agreements and their implications.
The fallout from the livestream has also renewed broader conversations about the intersection of online entertainment culture with public institutions. As livestreaming platforms continue to grow and monetize unconventional content formats, schools may increasingly find themselves contending with rental requests that blur the lines between entertainment, marketing, and educational appropriateness. The Canyon Crest Academy incident highlights how quickly a seemingly routine facility rental can escalate into a widely publicized controversy when judgment lapses at any point in the approval chain.
As the district reviews the matter, community members are awaiting clarity on how responsibility will be assigned and what corrective measures will follow. The outcry demonstrates that parents and students expect school leaders to exercise vigilance in protecting the integrity of educational spaces, especially in an era when digital content creation can rapidly bring global attention to local decisions.
winbetvip popped up on my radar. Had a look around. Seems alright, nothing groundbreaking. Worth checking out if you’re looking for something new. Give winbetvip a look!