A former Indiana Department of Child Services employee in Vermillion County is facing criminal charges following allegations that she falsified reports and failed to carry out required visits with children and families under her supervision. Megan Belleu, 43, who previously served as a Family Case Manager, was arrested after investigators concluded that she repeatedly claimed to have conducted meetings that, according to court documents, never occurred.
The case centers on accusations that Belleu misrepresented her work activities over an extended period, raising concerns about compliance, accountability, and oversight within child welfare operations. Authorities allege that her conduct included logging hours for meetings she did not attend and providing families with misleading explanations for her absence. The charges stem from a complaint filed by the Indiana Department of Child Services with the Office of Inspector General in April 2025, prompting a formal investigation that culminated in criminal filings.
The allegations against Belleu focus on the accuracy and integrity of case documentation, a core responsibility for Family Case Managers tasked with monitoring child safety and family compliance with court-ordered services. According to investigators, the alleged actions occurred while Belleu was actively employed by the agency, spanning a period that included multiple scheduled visits.
The case underscores the importance of documented, in-person contact in child welfare assessments, where decisions affecting children and families rely heavily on accurate reporting and verification. Prosecutors have emphasized that the alleged misconduct, if proven, interfered with child abuse assessments and undermined the reliability of official records maintained by the state.
Allegations and Criminal Charges
Megan Belleu has been charged with two offenses arising from the alleged falsification of official records and interference with mandated child welfare processes. The first charge, Official Misconduct, is classified as a Level 6 felony under Indiana law. This charge generally applies when a public servant is accused of knowingly or intentionally performing an unauthorized act or failing to perform a duty imposed by law. The second charge, Obstruct or Interfere with a Child Abuse Assessment, is a Class A misdemeanor, reflecting allegations that Belleu’s actions impeded the proper evaluation of child welfare concerns.
According to court documents, Belleu scheduled visits with children and parents as part of her case management responsibilities but, in several instances, did not appear for those meetings. Investigators allege that despite her absence, Belleu later recorded the visits as having taken place. These records reportedly included logged hours indicating meet-ups with families that never occurred. Such documentation is a critical component of child welfare cases, as it informs supervisors, courts, and partner agencies about family progress, compliance, and potential safety risks.
Read : Indiana Judge Steven Meyer and Wife Kimberly Shot at Their Lafayette Home
In at least one instance cited in the filings, Belleu allegedly told a family using a state-issued cellphone that she had been “pulled into another case in Indianapolis for another child.” Investigators contend that this explanation was false and used to justify her failure to attend the scheduled visit. Prosecutors allege that similar misrepresentations occurred on multiple occasions, contributing to a pattern of false reporting.
Read : Hawaii’s Kilauea Volcano Erupts Again After 50 Years : Watch Video
The charges do not allege physical harm directly resulting from the missed visits but focus on the obstruction of assessments and the integrity of official records. Under Indiana law, obstructing a child abuse assessment can include actions that delay, hinder, or prevent the accurate evaluation of a child’s safety or well-being. Authorities argue that by failing to conduct required visits while documenting them as completed, Belleu compromised the assessment process designed to protect vulnerable children.
Investigation and Employment History
The investigation into Belleu’s conduct began after the Indiana Department of Child Services submitted a complaint to the Office of Inspector General on April 29, 2025. The complaint alleged that Belleu had created multiple false reports related to her casework. The Office of Inspector General, which is responsible for investigating allegations of fraud, waste, and abuse involving state employees and programs, initiated a review of case records, schedules, and communications associated with Belleu’s assignments.
Court documents indicate that investigators examined discrepancies between scheduled visits and documented case notes. The inquiry reportedly involved verifying whether families had actually met with Belleu on the dates and times recorded in official systems. According to the filings, several families confirmed that the documented meetings did not take place. Investigators also reviewed phone communications, including the instance in which Belleu allegedly provided a misleading explanation for her absence.
Belleu was employed by the Indiana Department of Child Services from July 23, 2023, until March 18, 2025. During that time, she served as a Family Case Manager, a role that involves coordinating services, conducting home visits, documenting family interactions, and ensuring compliance with court orders. Family Case Managers are typically required to maintain regular contact with children and caregivers, particularly in cases involving allegations of abuse or neglect.
The timing of the alleged conduct has not been fully detailed in public filings, but authorities have indicated that the actions occurred during Belleu’s tenure with the agency. Following the complaint and investigation, Belleu’s employment ended in March 2025. It has not been publicly stated whether she resigned or was terminated, and officials have not disclosed internal disciplinary steps beyond the referral to the Office of Inspector General.
The Vermillion County case has been referred for prosecution, and Belleu now faces the legal process associated with the charges. As with all criminal cases, the allegations remain unproven until adjudicated in court. Prosecutors are expected to rely on documentation, witness statements from affected families, and employment records to support the charges. Defense counsel has not publicly commented on the case as of the latest filings.
Broader Implications for Child Welfare Oversight
The charges against a former Family Case Manager have drawn attention to the systems in place to monitor compliance and accuracy within child welfare agencies. While the case centers on individual allegations, it also highlights the reliance of child protection systems on accurate documentation and timely, in-person engagement. Family Case Managers serve as the primary link between the state and families involved in child welfare proceedings, and their reports often inform judicial decisions, service plans, and safety determinations.
Read : Father Requiring Stitches After Fight Over Alleged Line-Cutting in Indiana Jones Adventure Queue
Child welfare agencies typically employ multiple layers of supervision, including case reviews, audits, and performance evaluations, to ensure that required visits and assessments are completed. The allegations in this case raise questions about how discrepancies between scheduled activities and documented outcomes are identified and addressed. Officials have emphasized that the referral to the Office of Inspector General demonstrates an internal mechanism for reporting and investigating suspected misconduct.
The role of the Office of Inspector General is to provide independent oversight when allegations involve potential criminal behavior or systemic abuse. By investigating complaints referred by agencies such as DCS, the office aims to safeguard public resources and maintain trust in state programs. In this instance, the investigation led to criminal charges rather than administrative sanctions alone, reflecting the seriousness of the alleged conduct under state law.
For families involved in child welfare cases, regular visits and accurate assessments are central to ensuring that services are appropriate and that children are safe. Missed visits, if undocumented or misrepresented, can delay services, prolong cases, or affect court outcomes. State officials have reiterated that falsifying records undermines the purpose of child welfare interventions and the confidence of the courts and public in the system.
As the case proceeds, it may prompt renewed attention to training, supervision, and verification processes within child welfare agencies. While no policy changes have been announced in connection with the charges, similar cases nationally have led agencies to review documentation standards and monitoring tools. The outcome of the proceedings against Belleu will be determined through the court system, where evidence and testimony will be evaluated according to legal standards.
Megan Belleu remains charged with Official Misconduct and Obstructing or Interfering with a Child Abuse Assessment in connection with the alleged false reporting of visits. The case continues to move through the Indiana legal system, with further hearings expected as prosecutors and defense attorneys present their arguments.