A 44-year-old man is facing multiple felony charges following an alleged kidnapping and assault involving a 7-year-old child in New Hanover County, North Carolina. Authorities say the incident occurred near North Front Street and led to the arrest of Daniel Jason Summers on Friday by deputies with the New Hanover County Sheriff’s Office. Court records and arrest warrants outline allegations that Summers unlawfully restrained the child and engaged in physical contact described as assaultive in nature.
The case has drawn attention because of the age of the alleged victim, the severity of the charges, and the legal designation that the act was carried out with the stated purpose of terrorizing the child. Summers is currently being held without bond at the New Hanover County Detention Center and is scheduled to make his first court appearance on Monday, Jan. 5, at 2 p.m. As the investigation proceeds, officials have released limited details, emphasizing that the charges stem from actions described in sworn warrants rather than findings established through trial.
Details of the Alleged Incident and Arrest
According to information contained in arrest warrants, the incident that led to Daniel Jason Summers’ arrest took place near North Front Street, an area that includes a mix of residential, commercial, and pedestrian traffic. Deputies responded to reports that ultimately resulted in Summers being taken into custody on Friday. The warrants allege that Summers kidnapped the child with “the purpose of terrorizing,” a legal phrase that carries specific meaning under North Carolina law and elevates the seriousness of the charge.
The warrants further state that Summers assaulted the child by wrapping both of his arms around them without consent. In legal terms, this description forms the basis for the assault charge involving a minor under the age of 12. The wording of arrest documents is significant because it outlines the elements prosecutors must later prove in court. At this stage, the allegations are based on probable cause as determined by law enforcement and a magistrate, rather than a judicial determination of guilt.
During the encounter that led to his arrest, Summers is also accused of resisting a public officer. This charge suggests that, according to authorities, he did not comply with law enforcement instructions during the arrest process. Resisting a public officer is typically charged when an individual obstructs, delays, or interferes with an officer performing official duties, and it can be added alongside more serious felony allegations.
Read : Nurse Heather Thompson Fatally Shoots Two Sons and Grandmother in Quadruple Murder-Suicide
Deputies arrested Summers on Friday, and he was subsequently booked into the New Hanover County Detention Center. Jail records indicate that he is being held without bond, meaning a judge or magistrate determined that he should remain in custody pending his initial court appearance. Holding a defendant without bond is generally reserved for cases involving serious charges, concerns about public safety, or risk of flight.
Local media outlets, including WECT, reported on the arrest shortly after it occurred. The reports were based on official statements and court records rather than commentary from investigators or prosecutors. Authorities have not released the name of the child or additional identifying details, consistent with standard practice in cases involving minors.
Charges Filed and Their Legal Significance
Daniel Jason Summers now faces three criminal charges: second-degree kidnapping, assault on a child under the age of 12, and resisting a public officer. Each of these charges carries distinct legal definitions and potential penalties under North Carolina law.
Second-degree kidnapping is a felony offense that involves unlawfully confining, restraining, or removing a person without consent for a specified purpose. In this case, the arrest warrants state that the alleged purpose was to terrorize the child. Under state law, kidnapping is classified as either first-degree or second-degree depending on factors such as whether the victim was released in a safe place and whether serious injury occurred. Second-degree kidnapping still carries substantial penalties and can result in significant prison time if a conviction is secured.
The charge of assault on a child under the age of 12 reflects the enhanced protections afforded to minors within the criminal justice system. Assault charges involving children are treated with particular seriousness, and the age of the alleged victim is a critical factor. The warrants describe physical contact involving the child that authorities allege was non-consensual and harmful. While the legal definition of assault can encompass a range of behaviors, prosecutors must ultimately demonstrate that the actions met the statutory criteria for the charge.
The resisting a public officer charge is generally considered a misdemeanor but can have implications for how the case is handled procedurally. It often indicates that law enforcement encountered resistance during the arrest, which may be addressed separately from the underlying felony allegations. While less severe in terms of sentencing exposure, this charge still becomes part of the defendant’s overall criminal case.
At this stage, all charges remain allegations. Daniel Jason Summers is presumed innocent under the law until proven guilty in court. The filing of charges initiates the formal criminal process, during which evidence will be reviewed, motions may be filed, and prosecutors will determine how to proceed based on the available facts and witness statements.
Court records indicate that Summers is expected to appear before a judge on Monday, Jan. 5, at 2 p.m. This initial appearance typically involves informing the defendant of the charges, addressing bond status, and setting the next steps in the case. Depending on the circumstances, the court may also appoint legal counsel if the defendant does not already have representation.
Detention, Court Proceedings, and Ongoing Investigation
Following his arrest, Summers was transported to the New Hanover County Detention Center, where he remains in custody without bond. A no-bond status means that he will not be released prior to his court appearance unless a judge later revises that decision. Bond determinations are based on several factors, including the nature of the charges, the defendant’s criminal history, ties to the community, and potential risk to public safety.
The upcoming court appearance on Jan. 5 is expected to be procedural rather than evidentiary. Initial appearances are not trials and do not involve determinations of guilt or innocence. Instead, they serve as a formal starting point for the case within the court system. Additional hearings, including probable cause hearings or grand jury proceedings, may follow depending on how prosecutors choose to move forward.
Investigators have not publicly disclosed further details about how the alleged incident unfolded or what evidence supports the charges. In cases involving minors, authorities often limit the release of information to protect the privacy of the child and the integrity of the investigation. Statements from witnesses, any physical evidence, and potential surveillance footage, if applicable, would typically be reviewed as part of the investigative process.
Media reports referencing “Other WRAL Top Stories” and weather updates underscore that the information about Summers’ arrest was part of routine news coverage rather than a detailed investigative feature. As such, the publicly available facts are confined largely to what is stated in arrest warrants and jail records. Further details may emerge during court proceedings or through official statements from prosecutors.
As the case moves forward, the legal process will determine whether the charges are upheld, reduced, or dismissed, and whether the matter proceeds to trial or is resolved through other means. Until that time, Summers remains in custody, and the allegations outlined in the warrants form the basis for the ongoing criminal case.