Father Drove Mercedes SUV into Son in Anger Over Infidelity

Father drove Mercedes SUV into son in a shocking act of rage after a heated argument about infidelity escalated into violence. The disturbing incident, which took place in July 2021 at a car wash in Dalmuir, near Glasgow, resulted in the father, Kamil Mohammed Nadir, 55, being found guilty of assaulting his son, Rebath Kamil, 40, to the danger of his life.

CCTV footage captured the moment when Nadir deliberately drove his vehicle into his son, smashing him into a wall. The trial at Kilmarnock High Court revealed a deeply fractured family, torn apart by accusations and resentment, culminating in an act of violence that shocked the community.

The Family Feud That Led to the Attack

The incident was rooted in a long-standing family dispute. Kamil Mohammed Nadir, a former freedom fighter from Iraq, had separated from his wife, which caused tensions among his children. The catalyst for the violent confrontation was the accusation that Nadir had been involved with another woman.

Rebath, the victim, allegedly told his siblings that he had seen their father with someone else. This claim infuriated Nadir, who believed his son had spread damaging rumors about him. The court heard that on the day of the attack, Nadir confronted his sons at the car wash, shouting, “I will kill you all.”

Rebath was walking away when Kamil Mohammed Nadir suddenly accelerated his Mercedes SUV towards him, hitting him at speed and pinning him against a wall. The impact left Rebath injured and in visible distress, as shown in the footage presented in court.

Read : Alice da Silva Aguiar’s Father to Run London Marathon to Fund New School Play Area

Although the video had no sound, witnesses recalled hearing Rebath scream, “You tried to kill me over a woman!” This statement underscored the deeply personal and emotional nature of the altercation.

Courtroom Drama and Conflicting Testimonies

The courtroom proceedings were marked by conflicting statements and emotional testimony from family members. Initially, Rebath gave a statement to the police, asserting that his father had tried to kill him.

Prosecutor Donald Davidson read the statement in court, in which Rebath said, “He drove the car straight at me and hit me with it. If he was trying to scare me, he would have stopped the car, but he didn’t.”

However, when called to testify in court, Rebath denied making the statement, claiming his English was not proficient enough to have said those words.

He went so far as to say he loved his father and even asked if he could approach him in the dock and kiss his hand. This sudden change in narrative raised questions about whether family pressure or personal feelings influenced his testimony.

Similarly, Kamil Mohammed Nadir’s younger son, Datsan, had initially told the police that he and his brother Daban had physically confronted their father after the attack.

He described how they punched him, trying to prevent him from leaving the scene. He recalled hearing his father shout, “This is what I’m going to do to you,” reinforcing the idea that Kamil Mohammed Nadir’s actions were deliberate.

Yet, like his brother, Datsan later backtracked, stating that he had fabricated parts of his statement and could not remember what he had originally told the police.

Despite these inconsistencies, the prosecution remained firm, arguing that the initial statements given in the immediate aftermath of the attack were the most truthful and accurate account of what had transpired.

Verdict and Aftermath

After a three-day trial, the jury found Kamil Mohammed Nadir guilty of assaulting his son to the danger of his life. Judge Scott Pattison, in delivering his verdict, expressed the severity of Nadir’s actions, emphasizing that the attack could have resulted in a fatality.

“It seems to me you drove your car right at him as he worked, and that you did that deliberately and at speed,” the judge stated. He further noted that the underlying reason for the attack remained unclear, though it was evident that it was connected to accusations made by Rebath regarding his father’s alleged infidelity.

Nadir’s defense, led by Paul Mullen, attempted to present him as a respected figure in the Kurdish community who had been deeply affected by his family’s conflicts.

Mullen pointed out that Nadir had been involved in mediating the separation between his wife and children and that the stress of this situation had contributed to his actions. However, this argument did little to sway the jury, given the overwhelming evidence against him.

Following the verdict, Kamil Mohammed Nadir was remanded into custody, awaiting sentencing. The case has left a lasting impact on the family, with deep wounds that may take years to heal. While Rebath and Datsan’s courtroom reversals suggested a desire to protect their father, the legal system ultimately determined that justice needed to be served.

The tragic nature of this case serves as a stark reminder of how unresolved family conflicts can escalate into dangerous and even life-threatening situations.

It also raises questions about the pressures within families to remain loyal, even in the face of undeniable evidence of wrongdoing. For the community in Dalmuir, the incident was a shocking revelation of how personal disputes can lead to violent consequences.

As the sentencing date approaches, the family must come to terms with the reality of what has happened. Whether they will ever be able to repair their fractured relationships remains uncertain.

However, one undeniable fact remains: on that fateful day in July 2021, Kamil Mohammed Nadir allowed his anger and resentment to drive him—literally and figuratively—into an act that nearly took his son’s life. The legal consequences may be clear, but the emotional and psychological scars left behind may never fully fade.

Leave a Comment

Discover more from Earthlings 1997

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading