Fox News Analyst Gregg Jarrett Sues Ex-Literary Agent Vigliano Associates Over Mysterious Royalty Payment

The legal battle between Fox News analyst Gregg Jarrett and his former literary agent Vigliano Associates has escalated significantly, with Jarrett now filing a new lawsuit over an unexplained royalty deposit that appeared in his bank account. The dispute deepens an already complicated rift involving earlier allegations that the agency and publisher Simon & Schuster conspired to misappropriate his pro-Trump book proposal. The latest complaint underscores Jarrett’s claims that his trust in the agency has collapsed and that he has been repeatedly denied basic financial transparency concerning his published works.

Breakdown of the Disputed Royalty Payment

According to the complaint filed in New York, Jarrett discovered an unexpected direct deposit of $8,014.21 from Vigliano Associates in October 2025. Historically, any payment issued through the agency arrived with documentation detailing the book or project associated with the royalty, along with the commission retained by the agent. However, this transfer included no explanation, and given that the parties were already in litigation over an earlier dispute, the deposit raised new concerns.

Jarrett’s attorneys immediately contacted Vigliano Associates requesting a full accounting of all financial transactions handled by the agency during their professional relationship. Instead of providing specific details, Vigliano responded with a brief two-sentence letter characterizing the transfer as unspecified royalties for “prior matters,” offering no identification of the title, publisher, timeline, or sales data associated with the sum. The agency further indicated that if Jarrett wanted additional information, he would need to obtain it through formal legal discovery.

The lack of clarity is at the core of Jarrett’s complaint. His attorneys argue that royalty accounting is a basic fiduciary obligation of any literary agent, and withholding such information constitutes both breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty. The lawsuit questions which book or books produced the royalties, what publisher remitted them, what sales data supported the payment, and how much money the agency received overall before issuing the deposit to Jarrett.

Read : Prepare to Aww: Unveiling the Top 10 Cutest Animals on the Planet

Without these details, Jarrett contends he cannot verify whether the royalty payment is accurate, incomplete, or connected to other undisclosed financial activity. He is now seeking compensatory damages, attorneys’ fees, restitution for any funds wrongfully withheld, and an order compelling the agency to produce a full accounting.

Ongoing Allegations of a Conspiracy to Misappropriate Jarrett’s Book Proposal

This lawsuit unfolds against the backdrop of an even broader dispute between Gregg Jarrett, his former agent, and Simon & Schuster. Earlier this year, Jarrett accused the publisher and Vigliano Associates of orchestrating a conspiracy to appropriate his book concept and provide it to fellow conservative media figure Alex Marlow, editor-in-chief of Breitbart News.

The complaint centers on a 2023 proposal Jarrett prepared at the request of Simon & Schuster executive editor Natasha Simons, who reportedly encouraged him to write a book examining the political and legal pressures facing former President Donald Trump.

Read : Former Fox 2 Anchor Angelynn Mock Arrested For Stabbing Mother to Death in Wichita Home

Jarrett claims that Simons praised the idea, believed it had significant commercial potential, and supported his plan to hire a research assistant to accelerate the work. It was during this stage, he alleges, that Vigliano Associates recommended Marlow for the research role. Jarrett accepted the recommendation and shared his detailed written proposal with Marlow, Simons, and his literary agents. According to Jarrett, this document served as the structural blueprint for the planned book.

The lawsuit asserts that not long afterward, his agent informed him that Simon & Schuster had offered an “absurdly low” advance for the project. Jarrett rejected the offer and instructed Vigliano Associates to submit the proposal to other publishers. Months later, the alleged conspiracy surfaced when Vigliano informed Jarrett that Marlow had sold a book to Simon & Schuster that was “somewhat similar” to his proposal.

Jarrett states that his agent acknowledged the similarities were substantial enough that he wanted to inform Jarrett before he encountered the book on his own. Marlow’s book, titled Breaking the Law, was published in mid-2025 and examines the legal cases involving Trump, a subject Jarrett insists aligns closely with the concept and structure he had developed.

Jarrett claims that his confidential proposal was improperly shared and ultimately transformed into a competing project marketed under another author’s name, violating both contractual obligations and professional duties. This earlier lawsuit remains active, and the new dispute over the unexplained royalty payment adds another layer of conflict to an already contentious legal relationship.

Legal and Industry Implications of Jarrett’s Allegations

Jarrett’s attorney, William A. Brewer III, has emphasized that literary agents occupy positions of trust requiring loyalty, transparency, and careful stewardship of financial and intellectual property matters. Brewer argues that Vigliano Associates’ refusal to provide a straightforward accounting of royalties not only damages Jarrett but undermines the integrity of standard industry practices. The handling of royalties is a fundamental component of the author-agent relationship, and any failure to disclose the source or structure of payments can expose an author to financial loss or contractual violations.

Read : 31-Year-Old Brazilian Influencer Adair Mendes Dutra Junior Dies After ‘Fox Eyes’ Surgery Complications

The allegations, if proven, could have meaningful implications for author-agent dynamics, particularly within the political non-fiction sphere, where proposals often involve confidential research strategies and competitive timing in publication. Jarrett’s claims that his proposal was effectively repurposed for another media personality raise questions about the handling of proprietary ideas in the publishing industry, the ethical responsibilities of agents, and the safeguards authors rely on when engaging with publishers and intermediaries.

Vigliano Associates, led by founder David Vigliano, has not publicly responded to the latest lawsuit, and The Independent has reported that requests for comment remain unanswered. Simon & Schuster has also declined to address the allegations tied to the earlier lawsuit. The confluence of financial disputes, claims of misappropriated intellectual content, and strained professional relationships has intensified an already public conflict involving high-profile figures in conservative media.

As litigation progresses, the central issues will likely involve contract interpretation, fiduciary responsibilities, and evidence surrounding the flow of Jarrett’s proprietary information. The unexplained royalty payment is now positioned as another example Jarrett cites to illustrate what he views as persistent irregularities and breaches of trust in his dealings with his former agent. The disputes highlight the increasingly complex intersection of media personalities, political publishing, and high-stakes intellectual property battles in a polarized political climate.

1 thought on “Fox News Analyst Gregg Jarrett Sues Ex-Literary Agent Vigliano Associates Over Mysterious Royalty Payment”

Leave a Comment

Discover more from Earthlings 1997

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading