Singapore, known for its strict laws and firm stance against criminal activities, witnessed a high-profile case involving an Indian-origin Singaporean, Vickreman Harvey Chettiar.
The 34-year-old was sentenced to 10 months and 12 weeks in jail after being found guilty of multiple harassment charges, including a serious threat made against the country’s former president, Halimah Yacob.
His case highlights the severe repercussions of making violent threats against public figures and the uncompromising nature of Singapore’s judicial system in upholding law and order.
Threats Against Former President Halimah Yacob
The incident that led to Vickreman’s sentencing began in April 2023 when he published an Instagram story that called for the killing of Halimah Yacob, who was then the President of Singapore. His post stated that she “deserves to be dragged out” and killed. This alarming statement quickly drew the attention of law enforcement, leading to his arrest and subsequent charges.
According to court records, Vickreman was motivated by his anger over the executions of drug traffickers in Singapore. The country enforces a strict mandatory death penalty for drug-related offenses, with the President being the final authority on clemency appeals.
It appears that his frustration with the policy led him to target Halimah Yacob, even though she was merely executing the duties of her office within the framework of the law.
Read : 11 Sea Robbery Incidents in the Singapore Strait in Just a Month
His post was not an isolated act, as he had already been out on bail for previous harassment-related offenses. This suggested a pattern of behavior that posed a continued threat to public figures and judicial officials.
Read : Capturing the World: Top Ten Countries with the Most Instagram Users
Following his arrest, the court imposed strict bail conditions, including the deletion of all his social media posts and applications from his electronic devices. He was also prohibited from logging into any social media accounts or making public statements online. However, his defiance of these conditions soon led to further legal troubles.
Additional Threats Against Judicial Authorities
Despite being charged and placed under strict bail conditions, Vickreman continued his aggressive behavior. On March 1, 2024, he sent an email to the State Courts expressing his dissatisfaction with the bail restrictions imposed by District Judge Lorraine Ho. In this email, he issued a direct threat of violence against Judge Ho. His actions prompted the State Courts to file a police report against him, leading to even greater legal consequences.
His hostility did not stop there. On March 8, 2024, just a week after sending the threatening email, Vickreman made a phone call to the police hotline in which he expressed an intention to stab the judge presiding over his case.
Alarmed by this development, the authorities took swift action. The prosecution, noting his repeated offenses and disregard for legal warnings, applied to revoke his bail.
In an apparent attempt to counter the prosecution’s move, Vickreman resorted to fabricating false evidence. On March 18, 2024, he filed a police report claiming that his email account had been compromised and that the threatening emails were not sent by him.
However, investigations quickly revealed that this was untrue. His false statements further compounded his legal troubles, demonstrating a continued disregard for the consequences of his actions.
Following these developments, his trial was postponed, but Vickreman failed to appear for a court hearing scheduled for March 22, 2024. As a result, a warrant for his arrest was issued. He was eventually apprehended on April 5, 2024, and presented in court the following day. Since then, he has remained in remand.
The Judicial Outcome and Its Implications
Vickreman Harvey Chettiar ultimately pleaded guilty to three charges of harassment and one count of fabricating false evidence. While 14 additional charges, including multiple harassment offenses, were considered during his sentencing, he was sentenced to 10 months and 12 weeks in jail for the primary charges.
The severity of the sentence underscores the seriousness with which Singapore treats threats against public figures and the judiciary.
The case serves as a stark reminder that Singapore maintains a zero-tolerance policy for harassment, particularly when directed at individuals holding high office or involved in judicial proceedings.
It also highlights the broader issue of online threats and their consequences. In an era where social media has become a powerful tool for expressing opinions, the boundaries between free speech and criminal threats remain strictly enforced by legal frameworks.
Another key aspect of this case was Vickreman’s attempt to use mental health as a defense. According to court records, he claimed to suffer from mental disorders, but the Institute of Mental Health found no substantial evidence to support these claims after evaluating him twice. This finding played a crucial role in his sentencing, as it demonstrated that his actions were not a result of psychiatric instability but rather a conscious choice.
The swift legal actions taken by the Singaporean judiciary in this case highlight the efficiency of the country’s legal system in dealing with individuals who pose a threat to public safety. It also sends a clear message that any form of harassment, especially against national leaders and judicial officers, will be met with strict punishment.
Vickreman’s case is also significant in the broader context of Singapore’s strict regulations on online conduct. The country has enacted various laws to curb hate speech, harassment, and online threats, ensuring that social media is not misused to incite violence or spread misinformation. The harsh penalty imposed on Vickreman serves as a deterrent to others who may consider using digital platforms to engage in similar activities.
In conclusion, the sentencing of Vickreman Harvey Chettiar stands as a strong testament to Singapore’s firm stance against harassment and threats. His case illustrates the serious consequences of making violent threats against high-ranking officials and the judiciary.
It also reinforces the country’s commitment to upholding law and order, regardless of the motivations behind an individual’s actions. With the rise of digital communication, cases like this serve as a crucial reminder that the virtual world is not beyond the reach of legal accountability.
Singapore’s strict laws ensure that anyone who crosses the line into criminal threats will face justice, maintaining the country’s reputation as one of the safest and most orderly societies in the world.
let’s enjoy few years on earth with peace and happiness….✍🏼🙏