Khalistanis Ask Canadians To Leave Canada. A recent incident in Canada has captured global attention as Khalistani sympathizers, during a Nagar Kirtan procession, demanded that Canadians “go back to England and Europe,” calling Canada “our own country.”
This event, caught on video and widely circulated, has raised concerns about the growing influence of Khalistani groups in Canada and heightened tensions in the already strained relations between Canada and India.
Over the past year, these tensions have escalated, especially in the wake of the controversial assassination of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a known Khalistani activist.
Khalistanis Ask Canadians To Leave Canada in Canada
The rise of Khalistani activism in Canada has sparked significant concern, particularly given the explicit demands made by Khalistani supporters for non-Sikh Canadians to leave the country.
The recent Nagar Kirtan procession, which circulated a message asking Canadians to “go back to England and Europe,” highlights the complex and increasingly volatile presence of Khalistani groups in Canadian society.
Originally rooted in advocating for a separate Sikh state in India, the Khalistani movement has taken a new form in Canada, where these groups are vocal in both political and social spheres, often spreading divisive messages that threaten social harmony.
Indian intelligence officials have described this as the “new normal” in Canada, warning that the Khalistani presence is no longer limited to fringe groups but is seeping into mainstream activities.
Reports suggest that Khalistani sympathizers have, in some areas, begun to exert control over local communities and even attempt to extort protection money from Hindu residents. Such incidents are a worrying sign for Canada’s multicultural society, where tolerance and diversity have traditionally been strong values.
Read : Hindus and Sikhs Unite: Anger Against Khalistanis Spills Onto Canada Streets
These incidents have prompted Canada to question the balance between freedom of expression and the need to prevent extremist ideologies from disrupting social harmony.
Khalistanis march around Surrey BC and claim “we are the owners of Canada” and “white people should go back to Europe and Israel”.
— Daniel Bordman (@DanielBordmanOG) November 13, 2024
How are we allowing these r*tards to shape our foreign policy? pic.twitter.com/9VmEnrVlGP
As these Khalistani groups grow bolder, Indian officials have urged Canada to address their activities more seriously, as these groups appear to be using Canada as a base for plotting anti-India propaganda and promoting an agenda of hostility.
India-Canada Relations in Crisis
The incident comes on the heels of strained relations between India and Canada, a situation further complicated by the assassination of Hardeep Singh Nijjar in June 2023. Nijjar, a Khalistani sympathizer labeled a terrorist by India, was killed in Canada, and his death has since been a point of contention.
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau accused Indian agents of being involved, citing intelligence inputs but later admitting a lack of concrete evidence. This accusation led to the expulsion of diplomats from both nations and deepened the rift between the two governments.
India has denied these allegations, calling them “preposterous,” and has further accused Trudeau of allowing anti-India elements to operate freely on Canadian soil. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressed concerns over incidents involving attacks on Hindu temples in Canada and called for an end to targeted aggression against Hindu Canadians.
This diplomatic standoff has been exacerbated by the growing presence of Khalistani sympathizers in Canadian politics, with India alleging that several Canadian parliamentarians support the Khalistani agenda, effectively pushing Trudeau into a corner politically.
The tensions between India and Canada illustrate the complex interplay of diaspora politics and national interest. Trudeau’s actions, seen by Indian officials as a move to placate pro-Khalistani MPs and secure political backing, have been labeled irresponsible.
Indian intelligence sources argue that Trudeau’s approach, relying on unverified intelligence, not only damages bilateral ties but also harms his own reputation as a leader on the global stage.
Political Motivations and the Domestic Landscape in Canada
The broader political landscape in Canada provides context for Trudeau’s stance, particularly as he faces a significant challenge in maintaining the support of Khalistani sympathizers within the government.
The influence of New Democratic Party leader Jagmeet Singh, a known Khalistani sympathizer, has been instrumental in supporting Trudeau’s government, especially as the prime minister’s popularity has waned.
Intelligence sources speculate that Trudeau’s stance on Nijjar’s killing and his support for Khalistani groups is largely influenced by the need to secure Singh’s backing in the upcoming election.
Canadian media and political analysts have expressed concern that Trudeau’s handling of the India-Khalistan issue could backfire domestically. The liberal use of intelligence inputs as a basis for diplomatic action has led to scrutiny, with critics questioning whether Trudeau is prioritizing personal political gains over responsible governance.
Indian officials have been vocal about their disapproval, with intelligence sources questioning the logic behind Trudeau’s allegations against India based on secondhand information from MPs without concrete proof. This approach, they argue, has unnecessarily damaged diplomatic ties and emboldened Khalistani supporters in Canada.
Within Canada, the support for Khalistani groups has fueled polarization, with communities feeling increasingly targeted and divided. The attacks on Hindu temples and the intimidation tactics against Hindu communities reflect a troubling trend that Trudeau’s government has yet to address effectively.
As Trudeau grapples with mounting political pressures, the question remains whether his administration will prioritize Canada’s long-term interests over the immediate needs of political alliances.
The escalating actions of Khalistani sympathizers in Canada are straining the country’s social fabric and risking international relations. The recent incident, where Khalistani supporters publicly demanded Canadians to leave their “own” country, illustrates the boldness of these groups and the potential consequences of unchecked extremism.
For Canada, addressing this issue will require a balance between upholding freedom of speech and ensuring that extremist ideologies do not take root in a way that harms society or weakens diplomatic ties with allies.
The tensions between India and Canada underscore a significant diplomatic challenge, particularly as Khalistani sympathizers gain influence within Canada’s political landscape.
As both countries navigate these complexities, the responsibility lies with leaders to maintain an open dialogue and uphold mutual respect. For Trudeau, these developments offer a critical test of his leadership and his commitment to a united Canada.
let’s enjoy few years on earth with peace and happiness….✍🏼🙏