The 2006 deal to end the war between Lebanon and Israel is once again in focus, as Prime Minister Najib Mikati has confirmed that Lebanon is ready to fully implement the agreement, including sending the Lebanese army to secure the region south of the Litani River.
This move comes amid ongoing tensions and the threat of further escalation, as Israeli forces continue to target Hezbollah strongholds in Lebanon.
The 2006 deal to end the war, formally known as United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701, has been a key point of discussion in Lebanon’s efforts to secure peace.
Read : Thousands Flee to Beirut Leaving Home in Lebanon Amid Israeli Strike
Mikati’s recent statement signals Lebanon’s willingness to comply with the agreement in order to prevent further conflict, which has already resulted in significant loss of life and displacement within the country.
What Was the 2006 Deal to End the War?
The 2006 deal to end the war, or UNSC Resolution 1701, was established in the wake of the 34-day conflict between Hezbollah and Israel. This war, which left deep scars on Lebanon and its people, culminated in a ceasefire agreement that required several crucial steps to stabilize the region.
One of the core provisions of this deal was the withdrawal of Israeli forces from southern Lebanon and the establishment of a security buffer zone south of the Litani River.
The resolution also mandated that the Lebanese army, along with UN peacekeepers, would be the only armed forces permitted in this area, effectively prohibiting Hezbollah’s military presence.
However, while this deal was initially implemented, Hezbollah’s presence has continued in parts of southern Lebanon, creating ongoing tensions with Israel.
The 2006 deal to end the war was not just about military arrangements; it also aimed to foster long-term peace and stability in the region.
The presence of Hezbollah’s weapons has remained a point of contention, with Israel viewing it as a direct threat to its security. This new move by Lebanon, led by Mikati, to fully implement the deal offers a possible pathway to peace if a ceasefire holds.
Current Challenges and Escalating Conflict
Despite Lebanon’s readiness to implement the 2006 deal to end the war, the situation on the ground remains volatile. In the past two weeks, Israeli forces have launched a series of attacks on Hezbollah targets in Lebanon, killing several commanders and heightening fears of a broader military conflict.
The possibility of a full-scale ground invasion by Israel is now on the minds of many, further raising concerns about how the situation could spiral out of control.
Prime Minister Mikati, along with House Speaker Nabih Berri, has acknowledged that Lebanon’s political stability is also tied to this conflict.
Both leaders agreed that electing a new president, a position that has been vacant for nearly two years, would only occur after a ceasefire takes hold. This underscores how intertwined Lebanon’s internal politics are with regional security issues.
The humanitarian impact of this conflict has been devastating. Lebanon’s Health Ministry reports that more than 1,000 people have been killed and 6,000 wounded in the recent violence, though it did not specify how many of these were civilians.
Additionally, one million people—a fifth of Lebanon’s population—have been displaced, highlighting the massive toll that continued hostilities have taken on the country.
Lebanon’s Path to Stability: The Role of the Lebanese Army
Mikati’s commitment to sending the Lebanese army to the area south of the Litani River is a pivotal aspect of the 2006 deal to end the war. This move is designed to restore Lebanon’s sovereignty over its southern border, a region that has long been a flashpoint due to Hezbollah’s activities.
By deploying the army in coordination with UN peacekeepers, Lebanon aims to ensure that no armed forces other than its own, and those of the UN, will operate in the area.
However, implementing this plan is contingent on the successful negotiation of a ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah. The Lebanese government has expressed a willingness to act immediately once a ceasefire is reached, but the current instability and ongoing attacks make the timeline for this unclear.
Mikati emphasized the importance of international cooperation, particularly with the UN, in making this deployment successful. This echoes the original spirit of the 2006 deal to end the war, which relied on a combination of Lebanese and international efforts to maintain peace and security in the region.
While the Lebanese army’s role is critical, the broader question remains: Will Hezbollah fully comply with the provisions of the deal? The group’s deep entrenchment in Lebanese politics and military operations complicates efforts to fully implement UNSC Resolution 1701.
Hezbollah’s refusal to disarm in the past has been a significant obstacle, and it remains to be seen whether the current conflict will force a shift in their stance.
As Lebanon stands on the brink of further escalation with Israel, Prime Minister Najib Mikati’s willingness to implement the 2006 deal to end the war offers a glimmer of hope for a peaceful resolution.
By adhering to UNSC Resolution 1701 and deploying the Lebanese army south of the Litani River, Lebanon is signaling its commitment to stabilizing the region and reducing the influence of Hezbollah in border areas.
However, the path to lasting peace is fraught with challenges. The ongoing violence, the potential for Israeli ground operations, and the humanitarian crisis gripping Lebanon all point to a complex and uncertain future.
Much will depend on whether a ceasefire can be negotiated and whether all parties, including Hezbollah, will abide by the terms of the 2006 deal to end the war. Only time will tell if this renewed effort to implement the agreement will lead to a long-awaited peace in southern Lebanon.
let’s enjoy few years on earth with peace and happiness….✍🏼🙏