A United Airlines passenger, Yisroel Liebb, is taking legal action against the airline after a shocking incident aboard a flight from Mexico to Texas. Liebb, a 20-year-old Orthodox Jewish traveler from New Jersey, claims that he was forcibly removed and Pilot Got Him Arrested From Airplane Restroom because he spent too much time inside while experiencing constipation.
The lawsuit, which also names several U.S. agencies, alleges that the pilot’s actions were excessive, discriminatory, and humiliating. The case has sparked debate over airline policies, passengers’ rights, and the responsibilities of flight crews in handling medical or personal emergencies.
The Incident: A Bathroom Break Turns Into an Arrest
The events unfolded just 30 minutes into the flight when Yisroel Liebb left his seat to use the restroom. His seatmate, Jacob Sebbag, later grew concerned when Liebb did not return after 20 minutes and alerted the crew.
When approached by a flight attendant, Liebb explained that he was suffering from constipation and needed a little more time. However, the crew did not appear to be satisfied with his explanation.
According to the lawsuit, 10 minutes later, the pilot himself intervened, demanding that Liebb exit the restroom immediately. When Liebb did not comply fast enough, the pilot allegedly broke down the bathroom door and physically pulled him out—while his pants were still down. This caused Liebb extreme embarrassment, as he was exposed to fellow passengers in the process.
Read : Iberia Flight Delayed for Hours After Pilot Bitten by Stowaway Tarantula
Adding to the distress, the lawsuit claims that the pilot made discriminatory remarks, allegedly saying that this was how “Jews act.” The alleged antisemitic comment has further intensified the controversy surrounding the case. Liebb and Sebbag were then informed that they would be arrested upon landing.
Detention, Injury, and Legal Action
As the flight reached its destination in Texas, five U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents boarded the plane to take Yisroel Liebb and Sebbag into custody. They were handcuffed and escorted to a detention facility inside the airport terminal. The lawsuit alleges that the handcuffs were placed too tightly, causing Liebb to cry out in pain.
During the removal from the restroom, Yisroel Liebb also sustained injuries to his head and legs, which have caused him ongoing physical discomfort. The detention further complicated their travel plans, leading them to miss their connecting flight to New York.

Although they were eventually released without any charges, the ordeal forced them to book a hotel for the night and pay for additional meals—expenses that they believe United Airlines should be held accountable for.
Now, both Liebb and Sebbag are suing United Airlines, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Homeland Security, and the Transportation Security Administration. They are seeking compensation for the humiliation, physical injuries, financial losses, and emotional distress they endured due to the incident.
The Broader Implications of the Case
This lawsuit raises critical questions about how airlines handle passenger situations that do not involve security threats. While airlines must maintain order and ensure safety, this case highlights the fine line between enforcing rules and respecting passengers’ dignity.
If Yisroel Liebb’s claims are true, then United Airlines may have to answer for serious allegations of discrimination, excessive force, and negligence in dealing with a non-violent situation.

The issue of passenger treatment on flights has been a hot topic in recent years. Incidents of passengers being forcibly removed, discriminated against, or unfairly penalized have drawn significant media attention. This case could add to the growing scrutiny of airline policies and how flight crews are trained to handle conflicts and medical emergencies.
The involvement of U.S. federal agencies also raises concerns about how law enforcement responds to in-flight incidents. If CBP officers indeed applied excessive force in detaining Yisroel Liebb and Sebbag, it could lead to further legal consequences for the agencies named in the lawsuit.
United Airlines has not issued a detailed statement on the matter, only saying that they have nothing to share regarding the lawsuit. However, as the legal proceedings unfold, more details will likely emerge, potentially shaping future airline policies and passenger rights.
This case serves as a reminder of the importance of fair treatment and proper protocol in the airline industry. Whether or not United Airlines is found guilty of misconduct, the lawsuit highlights the need for better guidelines on handling medical issues in-flight and ensuring that passengers are not subjected to unnecessary humiliation or harm.