A lawsuit filed in Wichita Falls has brought renewed attention to health and safety practices in nail salons, after a woman alleged that a routine pedicure led to catastrophic medical consequences. Sandra Davis has sued Pro Nails and its owner, Michael Trung Tsui, claiming that negligent salon practices resulted in a severe infection that ultimately required the amputation of her left leg below the knee.
The case, now pending in the 89th District Court, outlines a sequence of events that began with what Sandra Davis says should have been a standard cosmetic service and ended with life-altering injuries. Court records detail allegations of inadequate client screening, failure to follow sanitation standards, and disregard for basic infection-control procedures, all of which Davis argues contributed directly to her medical deterioration.
The lawsuit seeks more than $1 million in damages, reflecting not only the physical harm she alleges but also the long-term emotional, psychological, and financial impact of losing a limb. The case has drawn local attention in Wichita Falls because of the severity of the outcome and the broader implications for consumer safety in personal care services.
While Pro Nails has not publicly responded to the allegations despite multiple attempts by local media to contact the owner, the claims laid out in the filing present a detailed account of how a pedicure allegedly performed on a compromised toe escalated into a serious infection. As the case moves forward, it raises questions about regulatory compliance, professional responsibility, and the standards customers can reasonably expect when seeking nail and foot care services.
Allegations Surrounding the Pedicure and Initial Medical Condition
According to the lawsuit, Sandra Davis visited Pro Nails, located at 3905 Wayne Ave. in Wichita Falls, on or about Feb. 20, 2024, for a pedicure. At the time of her appointment, Davis had recently undergone a minor medical procedure involving the removal of a hangnail on one of the toes of her left foot. The procedure, described in the filing as minor, had been performed by a doctor, suggesting that the toe may have been in a vulnerable or healing state at the time she sought nail salon services.
Sandra Davis alleges that the salon failed to take any meaningful medical or treatment history before beginning the pedicure. The lawsuit claims that no questions were asked regarding recent medical procedures, injuries, or conditions affecting her feet or toes. This omission is central to her argument, as she contends that a reasonable and properly trained salon should have identified her toe as a compromised digit that should not have been treated.
The filing asserts that proceeding with a pedicure under those circumstances deviated from accepted standards of care within the nail salon industry. Beyond the alleged failure to screen for recent medical treatment, the lawsuit also accuses Pro Nails of neglecting fundamental sanitation and infection-control practices. Sandra Davis claims the salon did not use clean or properly sanitized instruments during her pedicure.
Read : Nail Salon Worker Minh Phuong Ngoc Vong Arrested for Holding 13 Remote IT Jobs Without Degree
While the filing does not detail the specific tools involved, it broadly alleges that the salon failed to comply with basic hygiene standards applicable to nail salon services. Such standards typically include the disinfection of tools between clients, the use of clean foot baths, and adherence to state and local health regulations designed to prevent the spread of infection.
Read : AI Video of ‘Spaghetti Dance’ Goes Viral on Instagram: Watch Here
The lawsuit frames these alleged failures as particularly dangerous given the condition of Davis’s toe. Performing a pedicure on skin that has recently been treated medically, especially if the skin barrier is compromised, can increase the risk of bacteria entering the body. Sandra Davis argues that the salon’s actions, taken together, created an environment in which infection was not only possible but likely, setting the stage for the medical crisis that followed.
Medical Deterioration and the Path to Amputation
Following the pedicure, Davis alleges that she began experiencing severe pain in the affected toe. According to the lawsuit, her condition deteriorated rapidly despite seeking medical care. The filing states that she was eventually diagnosed with a series of serious infections and complications, including cellulitis, an abscess, and osteomyelitis. Each of these conditions represents a progressively severe stage of infection, with osteomyelitis involving infection of the bone itself.
Cellulitis is a potentially serious bacterial skin infection that can spread quickly if not treated effectively. An abscess indicates the presence of a pocket of pus caused by infection, while osteomyelitis suggests that bacteria had penetrated deeply enough to infect bone tissue. The lawsuit alleges that these conditions developed as a direct result of the pedicure performed at Pro Nails, asserting a causal link between the salon’s alleged negligence and the subsequent medical diagnoses.
Despite medical intervention, Davis’s condition reportedly continued to worsen. The lawsuit claims that efforts to control the infection were unsuccessful, ultimately leaving doctors with no option but to amputate her left leg below the knee. Such a procedure is typically considered a last resort, undertaken only when infection cannot be controlled through antibiotics or less invasive surgical measures. Davis characterizes the amputation as a catastrophic outcome that has permanently altered her life.
The filing emphasizes the lasting impact of the amputation, describing it as a permanent injury with far-reaching consequences. Beyond the immediate physical loss, Davis alleges ongoing physical pain, significant impairment, and permanent disfigurement. The lawsuit also highlights the emotional and psychological toll of losing a limb, including mental anguish and emotional distress. These claims are presented as part of a broader argument that the harm she suffered extends well beyond the initial medical crisis and will affect her quality of life indefinitely.
Legal Claims, Damages, and Broader Implications
In her lawsuit, Davis seeks damages in excess of $1 million. The categories of damages listed in the filing reflect both economic and non-economic losses. She is seeking compensation for physical pain and suffering, mental anguish, physical impairment, permanent disfigurement, loss of enjoyment of life, emotional distress, and medical and hospital expenses. Together, these claims paint a picture of extensive and ongoing harm that Davis attributes to the salon’s alleged negligence.
The lawsuit was filed by Streck & Davis Law of Fort Worth, a firm that represents clients in serious personal injury cases. While the legal arguments will ultimately be tested in court, the filing itself outlines a theory of liability based on failure to adhere to industry standards and basic safety practices. Sandra Davis argues that Pro Nails had a duty to exercise reasonable care in providing nail salon services and that this duty included assessing whether it was safe to perform a pedicure on a client with a recent toe injury or medical procedure.
The case also raises broader questions about oversight and regulation in the nail salon industry. Nail salons are subject to state licensing requirements and health regulations, which are intended to minimize the risk of infection and injury. Allegations that a salon failed to sanitize tools properly or to recognize when a service should not be performed may prompt closer scrutiny from regulators, depending on how the case unfolds. While the lawsuit itself is a civil matter, its outcome could influence how salons approach client screening and sanitation practices in the future.
At this stage, the allegations remain unproven, and Pro Nails and its owner have not publicly responded to the claims. The Times Record News reported that it reached out to the business owner twice but received no response. As with any lawsuit, the defendants will have the opportunity to contest the allegations and present their own version of events. The court will ultimately determine whether the evidence supports Davis’s claims and whether the salon can be held legally responsible for her injuries.
For now, the case stands as a stark reminder of the potential risks associated with seemingly routine personal care services when proper precautions are not taken. The legal proceedings will likely focus on whether the pedicure performed on Feb. 20, 2024, was conducted in accordance with accepted standards and whether any deviation from those standards directly caused the severe medical outcomes Davis experienced. As the lawsuit moves forward in Wichita Falls, it will continue to draw attention from both the local community and those concerned with consumer safety in the personal care industry.