Shanwei Zoo of China Admits Its Pandas Are Painted Dogs: Watch

The Shanwei Zoo in China’s eastern Guangdong province has been thrust into the spotlight after a shocking revelation that their supposed pandas are not real pandas but rather painted dogs. Visitors to the zoo, many of whom were outraged, captured videos and photos of these animals, which quickly went viral across social media platforms.

In one of the widely circulated videos, one of the animals, initially mistaken for a panda, was seen panting and even barking, prompting disbelief and outrage among visitors. As word spread, the zoo had no choice but to admit the truth.

The Shanwei Zoo initially tried to deny the allegations, claiming the animals were a rare breed of “panda dogs.” However, the barking and panting clearly gave away the truth. The animals in question were not pandas but Chow Chows, a fluffy dog breed from northern China, painted with black-and-white markings to resemble pandas.

The zoo’s actions have caused widespread criticism and ridicule, especially since this was not the first time a zoo in China has been caught misleading visitors about their exhibits.

The Incident at Shanwei Zoo

Visitors who arrived at the Shanwei Zoo expecting to see pandas were left stunned and outraged when they realized that the animals were, in fact, dogs disguised as pandas. One visitor noticed the strange behavior of the so-called pandas, which were panting and barking—traits clearly not associated with real pandas.

Read : Bhutan: The Land of the Thunder Dragon

The realization quickly spread as videos of the animals surfaced on social media, showing them lounging in fenced enclosures with black-and-white markings painted on their fur.

The zoo’s initial response was an attempt to cover up the situation. Officials insisted that the animals were a breed of “panda dogs,” a claim that sparked even more outrage.

The manager of the zoo, when pressed about the matter, admitted that these were Chow Chows, a breed known for their thick fur and distinctive appearance, which had been painted to look like pandas. She went on to defend the practice, claiming that Shanwei Zoo specialized in “strange animals and cute pets” and that the painted dogs were one of their top attractions.

Previous Incidents of Panda Deception

The Shanwei Zoo is not the first Chinese zoo to use Chow Chows disguised as pandas to attract visitors. Just a few months earlier, the Taizhou Zoo in Jiangsu Province was criticized for a similar stunt. During the May Day holiday, the Taizhou Zoo advertised “panda dogs” as a special attraction, hoping to boost visitor numbers.

The zoo promoted the animals as a unique breed called “Xiong Mao Quan,” which translates to “panda dogs.” However, after significant backlash from the public, they admitted that there was no such thing as a panda dog and that the animals were simply Chow Chows with painted fur.

This incident has cast a shadow over the credibility of zoos in China, especially when it comes to the ethics of animal presentation and the treatment of animals. The Shanwei Zoo and others like it face significant criticism for misleading visitors, exploiting animals, and creating false expectations among the public.

Despite the outcry, zoo representatives in both incidents have argued that they did not intentionally mislead anyone, as they had marketed the animals as “panda dogs” from the start. However, the painted fur and the illusion of seeing real pandas have left many feeling deceived.

The Ethics of Animal Disguises

The practice of disguising animals in zoos raises important ethical questions about the treatment of animals and the honesty of attractions.

At Shanwei Zoo, the decision to paint Chow Chows to resemble pandas has not only sparked outrage among visitors but also brought attention to the ethics of using animals as entertainment in this way. While some may see the use of painted dogs as harmless fun, others view it as deceptive and harmful to both animals and the public.

Chow Chows, the breed used in the Shanwei Zoo incident, are known for their thick fur and distinct appearance, which made them suitable candidates for such disguises.

However, painting an animal’s fur to create the illusion of it being another species raises questions about how zoos care for and respect their animals. Critics argue that by disguising dogs as pandas, the zoo is prioritizing profits and footfall over the well-being and dignity of the animals.

The zoo’s defense of using “natural dye” on the dogs does little to assuage concerns about the ethical treatment of animals. Whether or not the dye is harmful, critics argue that painting animals for human amusement crosses a line and misleads the public.

The fact that Shanwei Zoo admitted the deception only after videos went viral adds to the perception that the zoo was more concerned about maintaining visitor numbers than being transparent.

In response to the backlash, some zoo officials have likened the practice of painting the dogs to how people dye their hair, arguing that there is nothing wrong with using safe dyes on animals. However, the comparison between humans choosing to dye their hair and animals being painted without their consent has done little to quell the controversy.

The public reaction to Shanwei Zoo‘s admission that their pandas were actually painted dogs has been overwhelmingly negative. Visitors who felt duped have taken to social media to voice their frustration, with many calling for greater transparency and accountability from zoos.

In a world where wildlife conservation and ethical treatment of animals are growing concerns, incidents like this undermine the credibility of institutions that claim to care for and protect animals.

For many, the controversy surrounding Shanwei Zoo is emblematic of a larger issue within the zoo industry, where animals are sometimes treated as commodities rather than living beings.

The practice of disguising animals may boost visitor numbers in the short term, but it damages the reputation of zoos in the long run and erodes public trust. As a result, zoos like Shanwei Zoo must reconsider their approach to attracting visitors and find ways to offer engaging and ethical exhibits without resorting to deception.

In the wake of this incident, the spotlight has turned toward the broader ethical implications of using animals for entertainment. The question remains whether zoos that engage in such practices can regain public trust, or if they will face further scrutiny from both animal rights activists and the general public.

Shanwei Zoo’s case serves as a reminder that transparency and ethical treatment of animals are critical to the future of zoos worldwide. While the temptation to boost footfall may drive some to adopt questionable practices, the long-term reputation and success of a zoo depend on its commitment to honesty and animal welfare.

Leave a Comment

Discover more from Earthlings 1997

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading