Singer Tish Hyman Claims Gold’s Gym Revoked Her Membership Over Transgender Locker Room Complaint

The recent controversy surrounding singer and songwriter Tish Hyman and the Beverly Center Gold’s Gym has reignited a deeply divisive national conversation on transgender rights and women’s privacy in public facilities. Following Hyman’s account of feeling uncomfortable and violated after encountering a transgender woman in the women’s locker room, the gym reportedly revoked her membership, sparking a wave of backlash across social media platforms.

In the days since, the gym—now under EoS Fitness ownership—has seen a surge of negative online reviews, emotional reactions from gym-goers, and strong commentary from activists on both sides of the issue. This incident touches on complex questions about respect, inclusion, and safety in shared spaces, reflecting broader tensions unfolding across the United States amid recent policy changes and shifting cultural norms.

While discussions around gender identity, public accommodations, and women’s rights have been ongoing for years, the rapidly intensifying online reaction to this particular case illustrates that the debate is far from settled. With many women expressing fears about privacy and protection, and advocates for transgender rights emphasizing dignity and legal equality, the situation has become both highly personal and deeply political.

How corporations respond to these concerns is increasingly shaping public perception and influencing consumer behavior, as the wave of reviews directed at Gold’s Gym demonstrates. The unfolding developments will likely play a significant role in shaping future conversations and policies regarding locker room access and membership conduct rules within fitness centers and other gender-segregated facilities.

Tish Hyman’s Account and the Incident Inside the Locker Room

According to Hyman’s description of the events, the incident occurred while she was using the women’s locker room at the Beverly Center location of Gold’s Gym. In a video shared widely on TikTok and X (formerly Twitter), Tish Hyman recounted that she had been undressed when she turned around and saw a transgender woman in the locker room. She described the individual as someone wearing what she referred to as “boy clothes” along with lip gloss, saying she immediately felt startled and uncomfortable.

She said she questioned why the individual was present in the women’s area, only for the person to respond that she identified as a woman and therefore had the right to be there. Tish Hyman expressed profound discomfort in her retelling of the experience, stating that she felt “violated” and “weird” as the situation unfolded. Her videos show her visibly upset while discussing the incident, and she later shared that the encounter had left her shaken and emotional.

The situation reportedly escalated when the two individuals exchanged words, eventually leading to gym employees stepping in and the police being called. Tish Hyman claims that both she and the transgender woman were escorted out of the facility, but what followed caused an even greater public reaction: Hyman says that her membership was terminated, while the gym allegedly did not take her concerns seriously.

Today he saw me walk into the women’s room followed me in and called me a bitch. I ran out into the locker room crying and screaming. This is why we can’t be quiet because people need to know what’s happening. Thank you to the men who helped me today. pic.twitter.com/TlpCNCF8SW

— Tish Hyman (@listen2tish) November 3, 2025

She also stated on social media that she was “embarrassed” at being removed from the premises, and that what troubled her most was the fact that she believed gym management had previously received other complaints from women regarding the same individual. She alleged that the concerns reported by women about feeling unsafe or uncomfortable were ignored, suggesting a pattern of unresolved tension within the gym environment.

Hyman emphasized that her reaction was not rooted in hatred or intolerance, but in personal discomfort as a woman expecting privacy in a space she understood to be reserved for biological females. Her supporters have echoed this sentiment, arguing that emotional and physical vulnerability in changing areas should be handled with sensitivity, especially when nudity is involved. Critics, however, argue that confronting a transgender woman or filming interactions in such spaces risks harassment and discrimination, and that gender identity should be respected without exception.

Public Response and the Rise of Negative Reviews

Once the story began circulating widely online, public reaction quickly intensified. The Beverly Center Gold’s Gym page on Google was soon inundated with one-star reviews, many of which directly referenced Hyman’s account. Several reviewers emphasized their belief that gym management had failed to prioritize the comfort and safety of female members, while others went further, accusing the gym of supporting what they characterized as inappropriate behavior in a women’s space.

Some individuals who posted reviews said they canceled their memberships in solidarity with Hyman. Others expressed concern about a perceived lack of transparency regarding locker room policies. Many of the comments included emotional language describing fear, anger, and betrayal, reflecting the personal nature of the issue for women who view locker rooms as inherently private spaces.

Read : Work It Off! Thief Punished With Brutal Gym Workout After Being Caught Red-Handed

At the same time, supporters of transgender rights criticized the tone and content of the backlash, arguing that such responses reinforce harmful stigmas and misunderstandings about transgender individuals. They contended that gyms and similar facilities are increasingly obligated under anti-discrimination laws to allow individuals to use the facilities that correspond with their gender identity. From this standpoint, Hyman’s objection was viewed by some as rooted not in safety concerns, but in discomfort with transgender identity itself.

Conservative commentators and activists seized on the incident as symbolic of broader cultural conflicts. Riley Gaines, known for her advocacy against transgender inclusion in women’s sports, praised Hyman’s willingness to speak publicly. Commentators framed the incident as part of a larger societal shift being promoted by political and institutional authorities, with critics arguing that female privacy and protections are being eroded.

What makes the reaction particularly noteworthy is the way it manifested through consumer behavior and public review platforms. Businesses are increasingly expected to navigate politically charged social expectations, and the success or failure of their decisions plays out in real time through digital reputation. The volume and speed of the negative reviews aimed at Gold’s Gym illustrate the power of public perception and the emotional investment many individuals have in this issue.

The Broader National Debate and What Comes Next

The incident comes at a time of intensifying political action regarding transgender rights in the United States. Since returning to office in January, President Donald Trump has issued executive orders restricting access to spaces and activities for transgender individuals, including the directive titled “Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports,” which threatens financial penalties for organizations that allow transgender women to compete in women’s sports categories.

Read : Rijksmuseum Exhibits 1830 Condom Featuring Erotic Nun and Clergymen

These federal actions have energized both supporters and opponents of transgender inclusion, setting the stage for further legal battles and cultural disputes in the months ahead. The Gold’s Gym incident illustrates how national conversations influence everyday interactions and expectations in public spaces. Locker rooms, bathrooms, and athletic facilities have become symbolic battlegrounds for discussions about identity, safety, and respect. Businesses are frequently at the center of these conflicts, tasked with balancing inclusivity policies with customers’ comfort and legal compliance.

As of now, Gold’s Gym and EoS Fitness have not issued a detailed public statement addressing the situation. It remains unclear whether the gym plans to reaffirm or revise its policies regarding locker room access or whether staff training will be changed in response to the backlash. Likewise, it is unknown whether Hyman intends to pursue legal action, though some supporters online have encouraged her to do so.

What is certain is that this incident has placed the gym chain under scrutiny and has further amplified the broader cultural debate. Women who share Tish Hyman’s concerns argue that their privacy and emotional well-being must be protected without being dismissed as prejudice. Advocates for transgender rights argue that access to public facilities is a matter of dignity, recognition, and civil equality.

The path forward will likely require nuanced policy decisions, better communication, and thoughtful efforts to ensure that no group feels ignored or unsafe. The situation remains fluid, and its impact—both for Gold’s Gym and the wider debate—will continue to unfold in the public eye.